Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 31 (November 1), 2005: pp. 7919-7926
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.6642

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menon, U.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menon, U.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, I. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prospective Study Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm to Screen for Ovarian Cancer

Usha Menon, Steven J. Skates, Sara Lewis, Adam N. Rosenthal, Barnaby Rufford, Karen Sibley, Nicola MacDonald, Anne Dawnay, Arjun Jeyarajah, Robert C. Bast, Jr, David Oram, Ian J. Jacobs

From the Department of Gynecological Oncology, Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London; Biostatistics Centre, MA General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; US Department of Gynecological Oncology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University College London Hospital, London Department of Experimental Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Address reprint requests to Professor Ian J. Jacobs, Institute of Women's Health, University College London, EGA Hospital, Huntley St., London WC1E 6DH; e-mail: i.jacobs{at}ucl.ac.uk

PURPOSE: To evaluate prevalence screening in the first prospective trial of a new ovarian cancer screening (OCS) strategy (risk of ovarian cancer or ROC algorithm) on the basis of age and CA125 profile.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women, ≥ 50 years were randomly assigned to a control group or screen group. Screening involved serum CA125, interpreted using the ROC algorithm. Participants with normal results returned to annual screening; those with intermediate results had repeat CA125 testing; and those with elevated values underwent transvaginal ultrasound (TVS). Women with abnormal or persistently equivocal TVS were referred for a gynecologic opinion.

RESULTS: Thirteen thousand five hundred eighty-two women were recruited. Of 6,682 women randomly assigned to screening, 6,532 women underwent the first screen. After the initial CA125, 5,213 women were classified as normal risk, 91 women elevated, and 1,228 women intermediate. On repeat CA125 testing of the latter, a further 53 women were classified as elevated risk. All 144 women with elevated risk had TVS. Sixteen women underwent surgery. Eleven women had benign pathology; one woman had ovarian recurrence of breast cancer; one woman had borderline; and three women had primary invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for primary invasive EOC were 99.8% (95% CI, 99.7 to 99.9) and 19% (95% CI, 4.1 to 45.6), respectively.

CONCLUSION: An OCS strategy using the ROC algorithm is feasible and can achieve high specificity and PPV in postmenopausal women. It is being used in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening and in the United States in both the Cancer Genetics Network and the Gynecology Oncology Group trials of high-risk women.

Supported by grants from the UK charities Research into Ovarian Cancer and the Gynecology Cancer Research Fund.

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology, Brussels, Belgium, May 2003.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. L. Clarke-Pearson
Screening for Ovarian Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 9, 2009; 361(2): 170 - 177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Computer JournalHome page
A. Gammerman, V. Vovk, B. Burford, I. Nouretdinov, Z. Luo, A. Chervonenkis, M. Waterfield, R. Cramer, P. Tempst, J. Villanueva, et al.
Serum Proteomic Abnormality Predating Screen Detection of Ovarian Cancer
The Computer Journal, May 1, 2009; 52(3): 326 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Berchuck, E. S. Iversen, J. Luo, J. P. Clarke, H. Horne, D. A. Levine, J. Boyd, M. A. Alonso, A. A. Secord, M. Q. Bernardini, et al.
Microarray Analysis of Early Stage Serous Ovarian Cancers Shows Profiles Predictive of Favorable Outcome
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 15(7): 2448 - 2455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
U. Menon, A. Gentry-Maharaj, A. Ryan, A. Sharma, M. Burnell, R. Hallett, S. Lewis, A. Lopez, K. Godfrey, D. Oram, et al.
Recruitment to multicentre trials--lessons from UKCTOCS: descriptive study
BMJ, November 13, 2008; 337(nov13_1): a2079 - a2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online