|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 31 (November 1), 2005: pp. 7919-7926 © 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.6642 Prospective Study Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm to Screen for Ovarian CancerFrom the Department of Gynecological Oncology, Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London; Biostatistics Centre, MA General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; US Department of Gynecological Oncology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University College London Hospital, London Department of Experimental Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Address reprint requests to Professor Ian J. Jacobs, Institute of Women's Health, University College London, EGA Hospital, Huntley St., London WC1E 6DH; e-mail: i.jacobs{at}ucl.ac.uk PURPOSE: To evaluate prevalence screening in the first prospective trial of a new ovarian cancer screening (OCS) strategy (risk of ovarian cancer or ROC algorithm) on the basis of age and CA125 profile.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women, RESULTS: Thirteen thousand five hundred eighty-two women were recruited. Of 6,682 women randomly assigned to screening, 6,532 women underwent the first screen. After the initial CA125, 5,213 women were classified as normal risk, 91 women elevated, and 1,228 women intermediate. On repeat CA125 testing of the latter, a further 53 women were classified as elevated risk. All 144 women with elevated risk had TVS. Sixteen women underwent surgery. Eleven women had benign pathology; one woman had ovarian recurrence of breast cancer; one woman had borderline; and three women had primary invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for primary invasive EOC were 99.8% (95% CI, 99.7 to 99.9) and 19% (95% CI, 4.1 to 45.6), respectively. CONCLUSION: An OCS strategy using the ROC algorithm is feasible and can achieve high specificity and PPV in postmenopausal women. It is being used in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening and in the United States in both the Cancer Genetics Network and the Gynecology Oncology Group trials of high-risk women. Supported by grants from the UK charities Research into Ovarian Cancer and the Gynecology Cancer Research Fund. Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology, Brussels, Belgium, May 2003. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|